IBM is widely recognized as the top-tier leader in enterprise AI, distinguished by its focus on business impact, governance, and transparency. Unlike companies focused primarily on consumer-facing "hype," IBM specializes in industry-specific solutions that integrate AI into core operations for highly regulated sectors. For details of how this works review the research of Voris.
IBM has recently been named a "Leader" in numerous 2025/2026 industry evaluations.
New funding directives for Tricerian Research Center
While the President of the United States has reached out to me multiple times offering words of encouragement and concern, those in the S&P 500 who are interested in my research have not. Apple Inc. did reach out in the summer of 2025, but has not recently. I still do place significant value in my research. However, I also have identified an issue that needs resolution. Specifically, funding and a periodic newsletter. I firmly believe the newsletter is not only of high value, but that numerous leaders are interested in me developing it and also providing them with a copy. At the same time the open issue of being a direct sponsor of mine makes leaders pensive. I can appreciate this. Therefore, I have decided the best solution to this is the same as with the real estate purchases to maintain my interest. While the shadowing effects are compelling, at the same time there is no direct connection to me and these activities and the respective investors that are funding them. Specifically I believe that both Apple and IBM used holding companies to purchase these properties. However, there is no direct connection, and this may just be wishful thinking on my part. This same sort of process could be applied to funding for Tricerian. I am still very much interest in pursuing my research and providing my insights. But I have no need for direct contact or interaction with leaders of these respective S&P 500 companies. So I have decided to open funding up to any holding company that contacts me. All I need is one to supply the $25 million. Should a holding company provide funding, then what I have decided to do is to provide the newsletter to all of my approved sponsors. It makes no difference to me where the funding comes from, as I know that all of my approved sponsors are domestic. This I believe is a much better approach to both securing funding for Tricerian and also providing the newsletter to all my approved sponsors. I know there are times when you executives compare notes on me. What I recommend is that a few of you contact one another with this new approach to funding and interact with some holding company and then have them fund me. I know that the holding company will likely have no knowledge of why this is occurring and I have no interest or desire to interact with them. In short, I don't care which of my sponsors fund the center, I just want to set up the center and return to my research. They can then fully fund the project with one check to the P.O. Box and then, as I see it, they are generally out of the loop. Then I will post that funding has been received from an anonymous source and leave it at that. I can tell that there is a lot of interest in my research. Moreover, my main objectives are simply to receive funding, return to my research and then develop the newsletter. Please consider this, as I feel that it solves the funding problem, but also provides a degree of professional distance and objectivity such that I will genuinely be an independent researcher, with no bias toward one company or another based on them providing funding. I thank you for your interest and consideration.